Search for: "State v. LIGHT-ROTH"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
We foresee no obstacle to a State’s dealing effectively with this problem. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:25 am
Their stories came to light through Hurrell-Harring et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:53 am
As our Supreme Court recognized in Roth v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
In light of this guidance, 401(k) sponsors, including those sponsoring 401(k) safe harbor plans, should ensure that their plans are timely amended to comply with the post-Windsor rules. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 2:32 am
One recent case, Strine v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring unconstitutional the Defense of… [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 10:04 am
In so holding, the Ninth Circuit was simply recognizing that the United States Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year in Standard Fire Insurance v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
Roth, 395 Pa. 270, 276, 149 A.2d 648 (1959)). [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
As the Supreme Court stated in Bumper v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 1:41 pm
Co., Inc. v Roth & Roth, L.L.P., 85 AD3d 467 [1st Dept 2011]; see also Goldstein Affiliates v Affiliated FM Ins. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
Political Backing v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:26 pm
In the State of Utah v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:05 pm
The facts are based upon a famous ethics case—Zimmerman v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
ROTH. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
" In Koch v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
App.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Petitioner's reply Title: Roth v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:38 am
” In Roth v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:33 pm
See her summary on the opinion in Bradley v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:33 pm
See her summary on the opinion in Bradley v. [read post]