Search for: "Strong v. Cook*"
Results 41 - 60
of 474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2019, 2:27 pm
In Indian Harbor Insurance v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:50 am
SeeSud-Chemie, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
New York v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 9:51 pm
See Lance Mfg LLC et al v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 2:40 pm
Williams Mullen is a prominent Richmond-based law firm that is "100 years strong," according to its website. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:01 pm
Apple v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 4:57 am
There was a strong dissent written by Justice Sheldon A. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 6:16 pm
Schedule V drugs are the least likely to be abused and are currently accepted for medical use. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:10 am
But that is in fact exactly what the respondent in the recent ruling in Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha t/a Honda Motor Co Ltd v Big Boy Scooter [2017] ZAGPPHC 513 suggested should happen -- Afro-Buff brings a detailed summary of the case. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:26 pm
--Court: Supreme Court of TexasOpinion Date: 6/24/11Cite: Marsh USA Inc v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
Strong brands as a barrier to entry, this time from "The Economist" | UK IPO publishes consultation on implementing Trade Mark Directive 2015 into UK law | Top 10 issues from submissions before UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert v Actavis second medical use battle | EPO looking for new legally qualified members of the Boards of Appeal | Repair or reconstruction: Where do you draw the line for exhaustion under patent law? [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 1:47 pm
By Eric Goldman Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 8:26 am
By Eric Goldman People v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:13 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 6:52 am
In this regard, the average consumer normally perceives a mark as a whole and does not proceed to analyze its various details (OHIM v Shaker, C‑334/05 P).In considering such distinctive and dominant elements, the Court noted that the figures in both marks are likely to represent strong or healthy people. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
Strong brands as a barrier to entry, this time from "The Economist" | UK IPO publishes consultation on implementing Trade Mark Directive 2015 into UK law | Top 10 issues from submissions before UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert v Actavis second medical use battle | EPO looking for new legally qualified members of the Boards of Appeal | Repair or reconstruction: Where do you draw the line for exhaustion under patent law? [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Wheelahan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 10:35 am
Therefore, the court is not motivated to overturn this provision without a strong reason. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Because human sex trafficking is so horrific, judges’ concerns about the problem may trump Section 230’s also-strong policy interests in judges’ eyes. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:34 am
Wolfe v. [read post]
