Search for: "Sweeten v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2013, 10:56 am by Michael Froomkin
The Supreme Court recently addressed this very issue in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:52 pm
There was no evidence that added sweeteners and sugar were not good carbohydrates or that the amount of trans fats was not in fact 0 grams. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 9:15 am
” Furthermore, the “Crunchberries” depicted on the PDP are round, crunchy, brightly- colored cereal balls, and the PDP clearly states both that the Product contains “sweetened corn & oat cereal” and that the cereal is “enlarged to show texture. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:05 pm by Michael S. Snarr
A February 2006 fact sheet published by the Foreign Agriculture Service explains that the SPS Agreement was adopted during the Uruguay Round with the support of “[v]irtually all countries, including the United States” because countries previously had used vague and opaque SPS measures to disguise restrictions on trade. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 12:30 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
That was the question the Sixth Circuit had to answer in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 1:34 pm by Michael Lowe
Under the CSA, there are five classification schedules (Schedules I – V) for their regulation, with Schedule I being the most restrictive and Schedule V the least. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:46 pm
Pulse Electronics and Stryker Corp. v. [read post]