Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Collins" Results 41 - 60 of 782
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2019, 3:27 pm
  Not three.Ten different Ninth Circuit judges recuse themselves from the en banc call:  Judges McKeown, Wardlaw, Bybee, Bea, Watford, Owens, Friedland, Miller, Collins, and Lee.So it's an opinion that may affect at least a nontrivial number of people in a particular socioeconomic group. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:49 am by Howard Wasserman
They further show that this increase began not with the Robert Bork hearings in 1987, but actually a year earlier with William Rehnquist's nomination to be Chief.* Although Ringhand and Collins don't say it in so many terms, the conclusion people are drawing is that hearings are substantive, meaningful, and beneficial, not the "vapid and hollow charade" that Professor Kagan decried in her sure-to-be-talked-about 1995 article. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:58 pm
  After all, the purpose of the fence, just like the windshield here, was in part to keep unwanted people and things out. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 12:50 am
Collin County's indigency rules by that standard are wrong on their face, since the judges are routinely finding many cases where people really couldn't afford counsel. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 11:03 am
Although I'm not ridiculously old, I remember an era in which Blecher & Collins -- run by Max Blecher -- was a scary law firm. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:07 pm
A few more details on R(Southwark Law Centre) v Legal Services Commission [2007] EWHC 1715 (Admin), which I mentioned a few days ago. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of David M. [read post]