Search for: "The People v. Gardner" Results 41 - 60 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2013, 2:59 pm by Charon QC
I have had the pleasure of meeting people who do daft things after a good shot of coffee. [read post]
16 May 2009, 6:30 pm
  In one of the battered woman syndrome cases, State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 2:30 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The common-law rule on mistake of law was clearly articulated in Gardner v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 10:47 pm
The Family Proceedings Rules (now the Family Procedure Rules) were specifically amended to allow people in her position to do so. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:23 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKReal PropertyRemand to Surrogate's Court Denied in Suit to Bar Deceased's Partner's Sale of Manhattan Building Gardner v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Adam Wagner
Judgments were also published in non-anyonmised form – see Doncaster v Haigh and Doncaster v Watson. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:26 pm
Full story: Children & Young People Now.CASESYLA v PM & MZ [2013] EWHC 3622 (Fam) (20 November 2013)Court of Protection proceedings concerning a vulnerable adult, and care proceedings concerning her child. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Hearsay only applies to statements by people—computer-generated statements don’t have a hearsay problem. __ This seems like a win, of sorts, for platforms, although not a great result for Cox specifically. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Actually, I have no idea if they helped or not but we’ll give them some credit anyway. v. # 15 Tribal Law and Policy Institute Always been a big fan of Jerry Gardner and his crew. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:06 am by Marie Louise
Pier 1 Imports (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Stare decisis effect of Federal Circuit claim constructions in later cases: Eolas v Adobe (EDTexweblog.com) ITC decides to modify final initial determination in Certain Biometric Scanning Devices (337-TA-720) (ITC 337 Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – HTC claims intervening rights against Apple in ITC case (WHDA) Ceronix – Doctrine of equivalents improper where it vitiates claim… [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the individual if he or… [read post]