Search for: "The Democratic National Committee v. Reagan"
Results 41 - 60
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2022, 7:54 am
The Supreme Court rejected Nixon’s challenge in Nixon v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am
Through a political action committee, Gopac, Mr. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:07 am
The challengers, who include the Democratic National Committee, argue the lower appellate court got the Section 2 analysis exactly right. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Democrats controlled the Senate, however, and his nomination did not move forward. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am
In the 2018 midterms, about 12 million more people voted for Democratic senate candidates than for Republicans, and the GOP gained seats. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
Liberal democratic regimes face informational pressure from abroad. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:58 am
This is what the professor wrote that I found both defamatory and intellectually dishonest[v]: The Judicial Conference . . . suffers from a severe bias, which causes it not to ask for the creation of as many new judgeships as the nation needs. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
Barbara Jordan Barbara Jordan speaking at the Democratic National Convention in July 1976. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
The anti-apartheid movement took direction from the African National Congress (ANC), which was called a terrorist organization by President Reagan in 1986. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
Major League Baseball Player Relations Committee, Inc. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:21 am
In Lee v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
In 1910, William Howard Taft, a Republican, nominated two Democrats to the court. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
Alas, though, your question wrongly posits that the Ninth Circuit has improved over the years and that Judge Wallace and the Reagan appointees were able to turn things around. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
And they help to illustrate the point that past judicial service, while perhaps helpful in some ways, is by no means a prerequisite to being "qualified" to serve on the nation's highest court, because the job of a Supreme Court justice is distinctly different from service on just about any lower court apart from perhaps a state Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Neo-Brandeisians Challenge Economic Rationality in Antitrust Agitation for major antitrust changes intensified following the 2018 midterms, which resulted in a Democratic majority in the U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
The point is that the number of Americans seriously harmed by the mishandling of the foreclosure crisis are now more than enough to sway a national election. [read post]
