Search for: "Thomas v. Held" Results 41 - 60 of 7,404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2013, 4:54 pm by Nick Robinson
--> Guest Post: Vasujith Ram Recently in Lily Thomas v Union of India, the Court held that Section 8(4) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (RPA) was ultra vires the Constitution. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
UPDATED ON JUNE 26, 2013: In a landmark decision penned by Justice Kennedy, in which Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined (Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito dissenting), the United States Supreme Court held that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional as a violation of equal protection pursuant to the Fifth Amendment in the case United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:40 pm by Patent Docs
Supreme Court Holds That Invalidity Must Be Proved by Clear and Convincing Evidence By Donald Zuhn -- In the third patent decision to be issued by the Supreme Court in little more than a week, the Court in Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership held today that 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 6:11 am
"Clarence Thomas Is Right": At his "Think Again" blog, Stanley Fish has a post (TimesSelect subscription required) that begins, "On June 25th the Supreme Court held in Morse v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:37 am by Kevin LaCroix
In a June 13, 2011 opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas, the United States Supreme Court held, by a 5-4 margin, in the Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:48 am by The Federalist Society
In an opinion delivered by Justice Thomas, the Court held unanimously that there is no statutory “right to competence” in federal habeas proceedings; nor does a state prisoner have a right to suspension of federal habeas proceedings if he is judged mentally incompetent. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:48 am by The Federalist Society
In an opinion delivered by Justice Thomas, the Court held unanimously that there is no statutory “right to competence” in federal habeas proceedings; nor does a state prisoner have a right to suspension of federal habeas proceedings if he is judged mentally incompetent. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:14 pm by The Federalist Society
 Justice Thomas, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Alito, and Sotomayor, held that the Code’s sign provisions were content-based restrictions of speech that could not survive strict scrutiny. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
At the very end of last week’s oral argument in Flowers v. [read post]