Search for: "Transportation Line v. Cooper" Results 41 - 60 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2019, 2:19 am by Edith Roberts
Cooper, which asks whether the Constitution gives Congress power to revoke the states’ immunity from suit for copyright infringement, and race-discrimination case Comcast v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Société de Transport de Montréal, 2017 QCCA 1919 (38012) Can police be civilly sued here. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Rick
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 pm by Bexis
  We don't think the Oklahoma Supreme Court has gone further than allowing regulatory violations as evidence of negligence, see Jack Cooper Transport Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm by jesse londin
" (Hat tip: NASA Watch)COMSTAC minutes: The Oct 11th meeting, in which Deputy Secretary of Transportation Thomas J. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:24 pm by Lawyer Sanders
The bottom line is that a BFPP must be able to prove it provided full cooperation, assistance, and access to U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:24 pm by Lawyer Sanders
The bottom line is that a BFPP must be able to prove it provided full cooperation, assistance, and access to U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 9:44 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
(See Case C-452/12 Nipponkoa Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd v Interzuid Transport BV EU:C:2013:858, [2014] I.L.Pr. 10, [36]; See also to similar effect, Case C-533/08 TNT Express Nederland BV v AXA Versicherung AG EU:C:2010:243, [2010] I.L.Pr. 35, [49]) It is argued that the Hartley–Dogauchi Report’s interpretative approach has much to commend it as it follows the path of least resistance by narrowly construing the right to sue in a non-chosen forum as an exception… [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Emily Dai
Anderson talk about the case of Trump v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:31 pm
 The best expression of the foundation of that line was made in 1984 by Deng Xiaoping: socialism is meant to create the conditions for the production of wealth sufficient to make it possible to produce the conditions when communism is attainable, a premise that requires the state, through its vanguard communist party to ensure that all socially productive forces are most efficiently deployed for the production of wealth, which is the prerequisite for communism. [read post]