Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION"
Results 41 - 60
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
Or the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences who staged the event? [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
On December 18, 1951, the employees’ representative, United Steelworkers of America, C. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
That broadening has made it possible to offer the course not just to first year law students, but also to graduate students in the social sciences and in international affairs, as a grounding in the legal systems that are important in their respective fields. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
We begin with a short description of equity in its application n the United States. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
These together define a means of declaring law that remains influential in the United States. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:23 am
WOE to Corporate America Steve Baughman Jensen is a plaintiffs’ lawyer and he justifiably gloats over his success as lead counsel in Milward v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
Jury decision making: the state of the science. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
The Centre for Chinese and Comparative Law (RCCL) of the School of Law of City University of Hong Kong organised an marvelous International Conference on “Realisation of Socio-Economic Rights in Emerging Free Markets: Perspectives from China and India”. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
BALLON - #141819 [email] HEATHER MEEKER - #172148 [email] GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP [email] [address] [phone] [fax] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. ________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
(Celanese Corporation v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:09 am
26 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 4 from 2012: HV 9950 D35 2011 Criminal justice in the United States, 1789-1939 / Elizabeth Dale. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
United States, No. 2009-5135 (Fed. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
In Rozenblat v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
Applicable Rules The key difference between FCMs and securities brokerages is that FCMs, unlike securities brokers, are required by law to keep their customer funds segregated from the FCM's own funds. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
(Gray on Claims) US Patents – Decisions Federal Circuit Panel disagrees over application of Rambus v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]