Search for: "US v. Antonio Davis" Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The number in parens is the number of times I've used the tag. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Finally:  Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsCourt Orders Retention of Outside Vendor to Collect Responsive Documents, Investigate Possible Spoliation… [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:20 pm by Matthew Bush
The Navemar, The Pesaro, The Davis, The Siren, and United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Davis (11-714), on redistricting the state senate, and Perry v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
Antonio Webster v The Attorney General of Trinidad & Tobago, heard 14 June 2011. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
Avey, Prichard Hawkins McFarland & Young, San Antonio 9 $208,821,015 Products Liability Evans v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm by Steve Bainbridge
True, Fred Davis may eat into his stats, but word out of DC is that they may end up using a lot of two TE sets because of how weak they are at WR. besides, we were really starting to scrape the bottom of the barrel. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:51 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Ambush marketing is utilized frequently when a particular business would rather not pay for the right to use the name of a major sporting event but still wants to be loosely associated with it. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]