Search for: "US v. Crow" Results 41 - 60 of 821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2023, 6:26 am by Just Security
Analyzing State Employment Authorization for Noncitizens in the US by Ahilan Arulanantham (@ahilan_toolong) FISA Surveillance Reform The Year of Section 702 Reform, Part V: The HPSCI Majority FISA Working Group Report by Elizabeth Goitein (@LizaGoitein) and Noah Chauvin (@NoahChauvin) Biden Administration: Spy Tools The Biden Administration Should Continue Rebuffing NSO Group’s Latest Lobbying Efforts by Talya Nevins, Nicole Mo and Carrie DeCell (@cmd_dc) Supreme Court Ethics… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by Beatrice Yahia
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — US RESPONSE U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In each of these cases, the SEC highlighted that respondents’ employees used unauthorized messaging platforms on personal devices to communicate about business matters, and the respondents failed to preserve the “substantial majority” of these communications. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:07 am by Candace Milner
Southern States with Jim Crow histories are still relying on moral turpitude laws and the Shelby v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:55 pm by Will Baude
 at 23). 72: See Transcript of Oral Argument, supra note 47, at 167 ("From the beginning, the … plenary power doctrine was used to protect Indians from non-Indians. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Carson Turner
Zhao uses Connecticut as a case study to examine the effects of his proposed policy. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Unknown
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html Crow Tribe of Indians v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:35 pm by Matthew Campbell
Accordingly, the Crow Tribe sought relief from the Repsis judgments pursuant to Rule 60(b), so that the State could not continue to use Repsis. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
After the Supreme Court invalidated the use of race in college admissions in SFFA v. [read post]