Search for: "US v. Saad" Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Of course, the criminal law is preferable to immigration law, which risks indeterminate detention, judicially sanctioned use of secret evidence, and Canada’s shameful “loaded weapon” of the threat of deportation to torture under the Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) exception. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
PwC v SAAD Investments Company Ltd (In Liquidation), heard 29-30 April. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
PwC v SAAD Investments Company Ltd (In Liquidation), heard 29-30 April. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 1:40 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
In AFT Michigan v Michigan and several consolidated cases, public-school employees and their representative organizations challenged the constitutionality of MCL 38.1343. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:19 am
., Tudor Jones’s hedge fund; and Saudi Arabian financial-services firm Saad Group, according to the people familiar with the matter. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:23 am by Timothy P. Flynn
In a 2-1 decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals recently ruled that a certificate mailed to a state driver, notifying him of his suspended license, is "testimonial" as that term is used in the constitution thus, the Secretary of State must produce it's clerk at a trial for driving on a suspended license.The case, People v Nunley, arose in a district court in Washtenaw County. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:16 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
In a 2-1 decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals recently ruled that a certificate mailed to a state driver, notifying him of his suspended license, is "testimonial" as that term is used in the constitution thus, the Secretary of State must produce it's clerk at a trial for driving on a suspended license.The case, People v Nunley, arose in a district court in Washtenaw County. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:33 pm by Perry Herzfeld
In the recent decision Ackers v Saad Investments Co Ltd, the Federal Court undertook a careful examination of what needs to be established to satisfy one of the central concepts of the Model Law: the location of an insolvent company’s “centre of main interests” (COMI). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:59 am by Joe Consumer
Supreme Court believes a law like this is a bad thing for the country, as they ruled in the 2009 case in Wyeth v. [read post]