Search for: "United States v. City of Detroit"
Results 41 - 60
of 199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:46 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:33 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Alyass, Harvard University, “The People’s War on Drugs: Community Activism, the Carceral State, and the Crack Crisis in 1980s Detroit”Michael Z. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 1:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
The combination of the jock tax and differences between how states tax its residents may make some cities in the United States and in Canada more attractive than others. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Bey argues that the state trial court violated the United States Constitution by admitting certain "other acts" evidence at trial, over his objection. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 5:26 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment on all of Slusher's claims. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:29 am
In the consolidated case Davis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers - 3/23/15. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
” (Elonis v United States, 16). [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:50 pm
United States Sixth Circuit, 11/09/2010 Sykes v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Resource Investments v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
