Search for: "United States v. Goodwin"
Results 41 - 60
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2013, 10:36 am
The case of Sisson v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:23 am
” Gun rights groups have filed an amicus brief in support of the federal government’s petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 8:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 3:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:17 am
Gender reassignment recognition Prior to the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in Goodwin v United Kingdom, the law in the United Kingdom made no provision for gender reassignment recognition. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Donell v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:21 pm
He's been in the United States since 1993. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:00 am
BARNEY, TRUSTEE v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:11 am
The Second Circuit first embraced the per-workweek construction in 1960 in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:49 pm
Lund, Palgrave, 2016).Michele Goodwin & Allison M. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 1:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:35 am
Part II of the essay examines the initial forays of the United States Supreme Court into the controversial area of unenumerated fundamental rights in general, focusing on the history and underlying rationales of two key cases, Skinner v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
The aggrieved employee has the burden of proving that his or her employee organization’s action, or inaction, breached its “Duty of Fair Representation” DeOliveira v New York State Pub. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities, the Court distinguished its previous decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:20 am
Kraweloc’s co-counsel, Michael Rubin, responded that the decision would have retroactive effect, pursuant to controlling United States Supreme Court authority. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:56 am
Co-authored by Kara Goodwin and Noah Finkel Pending before the United States Supreme Court is a petition for writ of certiorari asking the Court to determine whether an employer may use payments for bona fide meal periods as an offset/credit against compensable work time. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:51 pm
Indus. v. [read post]
