Search for: "United States v. Stage Co" Results 41 - 60 of 1,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
The case follows another recent related decision in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:56 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
McNamara secured the first race discrimination verdict in the United States against a real estate franchise for failure to award a sales agency to an African-American in Tyler v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am by Broc Romanek
We have started posting the hordes of memos in our “Securities Litigation” Practice Area, but here’s analysis from Skadden: The Supreme Court of the United States today in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 1:44 pm by Caroline Gentry
Applying the United States Supreme Court’s recent class action decisions in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:08 pm by John W. Arden
Darius Sturmer, contributor to Antitrust Law Daily.A physician and a pair of physical therapy clinics, along with their principals, could have violated the federal RICO Act by orchestrating an alleged scheme to defraud State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. through the filing of claims for physical therapy services that were medically unnecessary or not actually performed, the federal district court in Ann Arbor, Michigan has decided (State Farm Mutual Automobile… [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:22 am by Kiran Bhat
The petition of the day is: Title: Barr v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
  In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
Halliburton Co., No. 09-1403 (June 6, 2011), the Supreme Court of the United States decided that in seeking class certification, a plaintiff in an action under the federal securities laws is not required to prove facts demonstrating loss causation. [1] In so holding, the Supreme Court rejected a contrary rule, adopted only by the Fifth Circuit, that proof of loss causation is a prerequisite to class certification. [read post]