Search for: "United States v. Classic" Results 41 - 60 of 1,580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2011, 11:07 am
You get more 5-4 decisions in the United States Supreme Court than 4-3 decisions in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
22 May 2018, 3:28 pm by Jeremy Saland
With a collective sigh from all sides of the gambling isle, both in relief and pain, what to date has often been associated with Las Vegas and spawned Classics from “Goodfellas”  to “Casino,” may now be offered to the masses across the United States and in the light of day. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:22 am
DirecTV decision was recently cited by the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia as an alternative basis for remanding a case to state court in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
United States (Alvarez Machain II), 266 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 4:36 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1892, the Supreme Court upheld Reed’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:49 pm by Rick Hasen
I can’t wait to read Joel Gora’s new article in the Georgia State Law Review symposium on Citizens United. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
Fyk received his requested relief against the United States, what would change? [read post]
16 May 2008, 6:00 am
Nintendo plans on appealing.The case is Anascape Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 10:17 am by admin@lawiscoool.com (Omar Ha-Redeye)
The game against the rival United States promises to be an Olympic classic! [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:37 pm by Bona Law PC
In traditional markets, that is, non-platform markets, the value of the last unit consumed decreases. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:01 pm by Bona Law PC
And if you want a deep dive on the issue, you should read my friend Chris Sager’s outstanding book “United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:47 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court recently issued a fractured decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]