Search for: "United States v. Humphrey"
Results 41 - 60
of 332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 4:08 pm
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which was decided by the United States Supreme Court today. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 5:16 am
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 7:04 am
United States 19-1362Issues: (1) What test, if any, should be used to determine whether a constructive amendment impacted a defendant’s substantial rights under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b); and (2) what showing is required to determine whether a constructive amendment is “plain” error under Rule 52(b). [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:10 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:32 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:32 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
New Page 2 Opinion Pub Date Short Title/District 07a0119p.06 2007/04/02 Humphrey v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 9:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm
§ 1983) United States, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:27 pm
I remain delighted by the writing in Judge Stucky's opinion for the court in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
United States, decided in 1926, and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
8 Sep 2006, 4:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Case date: 19 February 2019 Case number: No. 18-60144 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am
The specific test under the ECHR for justifying discrimination in the context of state benefits is set out in Stec v United Kingdom (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, a decision of the Strasbourg Grand Chamber. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Sept. 26, 2018, Humphrey v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
So, with all of that background, we return to FEF v. [read post]