Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 41 - 60
of 9,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2016, 4:24 pm
On May 31, 2016, the Supreme Court decided United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:15 am
On January 8, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) dismissing QuikTrip West, Inc. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am
The positions in this brief are somewhat surprising because the United States interests are generally aligned with false marking qui tam relators. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
[www.markschwab.us][www.markschwab.us]ny-821133 No. 08-13435-P _____________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _____________________________ MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:23 am
On March 30, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inUnited States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:29 am
Doe and Immigration Law in the United States The St. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:56 am
Mark Joseph Stern for Slate recaps the oral arguments in the Supreme Court yesterday in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 3:19 pm
’ State Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:05 am
In Kaite v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 2:21 am
Fiat Group Automobiles S.p.A. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 8:11 am
United States in identifying controlling precedent from plurality opinions. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am
The position of the EUIPO, when it comes to acquired distinctiveness through use in the UK for the purposes of an invalidation action against a registered EU trade mark (EUTM), is that the distinctiveness acquired through use in the UK is not relevant for EU trade mark applications filed after the end of the transition period (December 31st, 2020).However, the now said has not always been entirely clear, since case law (Decathlon v EUIPO (T‑349/19) EU:T:2020:488),… [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:59 am
Cabell v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:02 pm
“Trump’s Shield on the Bench: Brett Kavanaugh’s criticism of United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:52 am
This December the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided a significant case interpreting the false marking provision of United States Patent Law. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:20 pm
” (8) Recently, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio found that 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) found that Unilever had sold large quantities of and publicised the goods designated by its Community word mark IMPULSE in the United Kingdom and Italy, with that mark enjoying a 5% market share in the United Kingdom and a 0.2% market share in Italy [the product seems to be some sort of perfumed and/or deodorant body spray]. [read post]
