Search for: "Wales v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2008, 5:39 pm
Deeds not words: Let's have some action on prisoners voting rightsRobert Neill: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what plans he has to extend voting rights to sentenced prisoners in England and Wales. [218573]Bridget Prentice: Following the European Court of Human Rights' judgment in the case of Hirst v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am
On 16 March 2023, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 8:06 am
In Lozano v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 10:25 am
It was originally scheduled for November 8.This week the United States Department of Justice and the European Commission cleared the Microsoft-Nokia deal, and the England and Wales High Court entered a UK injunction against various HTC devices including the One mini. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 7:15 am
In Patrick v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:31 pm
In California, of course, state officials resumed recognizing same-sex marriages following the United States Supreme Court's June 2013 decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:16 pm
Then, Noble House filed the instant suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas on November 1, 2021. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:57 am
Fifty years later, 1964 saw the creation of the Office of Secretary of State for Wales by Harold Wilson. v. 13 of Welsh Legal History (Photo by Betty Lupinacci) Providing Wales with its own legislative assembly was no straightforward matter and in the first referendum, held in 1979, to determine whether Wales should have this legislative body, the vote was overwhelmingly against it. [read post]
10 May 2009, 11:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
United Kingdom and previously held to be correct as a matter of international law by a number of American and English judges (Siderman de Blake v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 7:59 am
The Advocate General also stated that a local employment unit could be determined by member states, and would be on the facts of each case. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:06 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:04 am
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:38 am
In a decision that is simply painful to read, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit yesterday decided in Autogenomics v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 10:31 am
The same patent was previously held invalid by the UK Courts for lack of novelty as a result an invalid priority right in Novartis v Hospira (see [2013 EWCA 516 (Pat.) and [2013] EWCA Civ 1663). [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:03 am
Last Thursday, 31 July, Mr Justice Mann delivered his judgment in Lucasfilm Ltd, Star Wars Production Ltd and Lucasfilm Entertainment Co Ltd v Ainsworth and Shepperton Design Studios Ltd[2008] EWHC 1878 (Ch), a 280-paragraph decision of the Chancery Division for England and Wales. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Roos & Anita Mackay, A Shift in the United Nations Human Rights Committee's Jurisprudence on Marriage Equality? [read post]
