Search for: "Way v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2021, 1:53 pm
In Blake v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:06 am
On February 4, 2013 the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Auer v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:24 am
On November 23, 2011, an en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a 38 paged Opinion that serves to overturn the trial court's decision to allow one party to review written communications by the opposing party to the opposing party's expert in the case of Barrick v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Afflicted with a “culture of complacency[1],” the Ontario Superior Court has long struggled to timely advance cases to trial. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
California Superior Court Judge holds that California's teacher tenure laws are unconstitutional Source: Findlaw – Breaking Legal Documents [By Adam Ramirez, June 10, 2014]“California's laws on teacher tenure, layoffs and dismissals deprive students of their constitutional right to an education, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled Tuesday, June 10, 2014. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:10 pm
Superior Court, supra, 108 Cal.App.3d 55, People v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:00 am
The Court of Appeal ruled Tuesday in Leonard Carder LLP v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 3:14 pm
That way, the master calendar judge can promptly get your trial scheduled before a new judge.San Diego is an "all-purpose" court, but sometimes, when you're scheduled for trial, your particular judge is too busy, so you get bounced to a new judge for trial.San Diego's local rules -- Rule 2.1.3 -- says that in such settings, your "all-purpose" judge magically turns into a "master calendar" judge, so you've got to make any peremptory… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Superior Court (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 214. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:43 pm
You can't -- or at least shouldn't have a one-way ratchet that says that the prosecution can withdraw from a deal if the voters do something the prosecution doesn't like (as a way of getting around what the voters did) but the defendant can't do the same thing in similar circumstances.Plus this is just too big, and important, of an issue to let it be resolved by the vagaries of which panel in the Court of Appeal a particular defendant happens to… [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:34 am
Nearly every time the Appellate Division of the Superior Court decides to publish an opinion, it's one worth reading. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:39 pm
You can see why the Court of Appeal comes out the other way, holding that the guy should be in juvenile court. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:42 am
Read what we've written and try to resolve the issue again, trial court. [read post]
19 May 2016, 12:54 pm
The easiest way to figure this out would be to order an exam. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Superior Court, 135 Cal.App.4th 263, 285-86 (1999)). [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 8:59 am
In a recent trial in Los Angeles Superior Court in the matter AFS Enterprises, LLC, v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
A deeply divided court, in Mullins v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:44 pm
Defendant relied on Pantos v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:56 pm
Current Superior Court III Judge Joe V. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:29 am
Yesterday, the Superior Court handed down its opinion in Sackett v. [read post]
