Search for: "William Baude"
Results 41 - 60
of 376
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
[A new source in the debate over Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.] [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
William Baude, Is Originalism Our Law? [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
, The Guardian (Dec. 29, 2023) Judge Luttig: Trump eligibility case ‘tests America’s commitment to its own democracy’, MSNBC (Dec. 23, 2023) Adam Liptak, An About-Face on Whether the 14th Amendment Bars Trump From Office, New York Times (Sept. 18, 2023) Noah Feldman, Alas, Trump Is Still Eligible to Run for Office, Bloomberg (Aug. 20, 2023) Baude, William and Paulsen, Michael Stokes, The Sweep and Force of Section Three (August 9, 2023). [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 10:40 am
Efforts to rely on Section 3 to keep Trump off the ballot in 2024 gained momentum after the release in August of an upcoming article in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review by two conservative law professors, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
Meanwhile, as Professors William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen have documented in a widely cited forthcoming article in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, there are other oddities of Griffin’s Case that make it a particularly poor authority on the meaning of Section 3.Trump’s team will lodge other objections. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm
Will Baude (#26). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
William Baude Comments on Oral Arguments in SEC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
William Baude, University of Chicago Law School, Jud Campbell, Stanford Law School, and Stephen E. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:57 pm
Professor William Baude taught Constitutional Law … … while Professor Saul Levmore taught a Contracts class. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Baude and Paulsen spend a majority of their 126-page law review article explaining why Section 3 must be self-executing. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
”William Baude, who teaches law at the University of Chicago, disagrees with Hollis-Brusky’s assessment. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:44 pm
In August, two prominent legal scholars who are members of the conservative judicial group the Federalist Society, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, suggested that Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment clearly bars Trump from running for reelection. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
A draft law review article taking issue with Baude and Paulsen, co-written by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tilman, entitled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen makes a good case that what happened on January 6, 2021 was not an "insurrection" and that the Baude/Paulsen reading of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is wrong. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 9:58 am
Will Baude Discusses Section Three in Part Two of Podcast qbaron Fri, 09/15/2023 - 11:58 Read more about Will Baude Discusses Section Three in Part Two of Podcast Amarica's Constitution The Two Experts, Part Two - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 9:11 am
Will Baude Discusses Section Three on Podcast qbaron Fri, 09/15/2023 - 11:11 Read more about Will Baude Discusses Section Three on Podcast Amarica's Constitution The Two Experts on Section Three - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:44 pm
” Blackman and Tillman do make the odd claim that William Baude and Michael Paulsen in their influential article claiming that an originalist reading would disqualify Donald Trump under Section Three and my somewhat less famous (i.e., obscure) blog post “disregard the fact that the debates they cite from the 1860s in support of their position look back to debates from the early Republic. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
In a new article, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen argue that the answer is yes because “essentially all the evidence concerning the original textual meaning of Section Three . . . points in the same direction . . . . [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 5:10 pm
“Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
[A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new draft article, titled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:01 pm
William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen have written a recent article, "The Sweep and Force of Section Three," in which they argue that Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment is a self-executing provision that renders Donald Trump ineligible for the presidency as a result of his role in attempting to overthrow the results of the 2020 election.The article has been the talk of both legal academia and the wider public in recent weeks, drawing a great deal of attention… [read post]
