Search for: "Wise v. Michigan, State of" Results 41 - 60 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2012, 8:38 am by Lorene Park
In another example, a Michigan federal court dismissed an employee’s FMLA claim because Michigan does not recognize same-sex marriage and her claim was based on her employer’s failure to approve leave to care for her same-sex partner who had brain cancer (Copeland v Mid-Michigan Regional Medical Center, ED Mich 2012). [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:22 pm
This is because the United States Supreme Court determined in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:34 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Starts Clock on Donald Sterling’s Potential Ouster Oregon becomes 18th state to legalize gay marriage, weddings already begunFederal judge strikes Oregon’s same-sex marriage ban; 9th Circuit denies motion to stay order NYPD Commissioner-Turned-Felon Bernie Kerik Has a Message For Us Now That He's Been to PrisonTrio of prominent lawyers seeking LSUC’s top elected job Ontario criminal lawyers rally around colleague sentenced to two years for smuggling drugs into Don… [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am by Scott Bomboy
Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and parts of McConnell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
A word to the wise should be sufficient, so if you don't already, learn how to navigate and use the FDA's site. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am by Marty Lederman
  Perhaps one or more of the possible outcome-determinative “swing” states (e.g., Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin) would omit his name, although even that is highly speculative, as it would depend upon questions of state-law authority and who controls the executive and judicial branches of the particular state. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am by Catherine Fisk
Ferris Faculty Association, in which the court unanimously upheld a Michigan law requiring fair-share fees, “where the state creates in the nonmembers a legal entitlement from the union, it may compel them to pay the cost. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
Michigan Department of Treasury, 16-698, and DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
More significantly, the Court in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders explicitly rejected the notion of shareholder primacy, stating, [read post]