Search for: "Wood v. Powers" Results 41 - 60 of 834
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2022, 10:57 am by Michael Ehline
It gives power to the federal government to oversee, among other things, vehicle registration, driver licensing, highway construction and maintenance, and car safety. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
Source: Susan Hilberg, History of Lattingtown Harbor, April 8, 2015.The cycles (or rhymes) of history Although the extravagant real estate of Cravath and Guthrie is a powerful hook for a legal audience, I’m not writing this post as a celebration of the wealth of Gilded Age lawyers. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 17 May 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v Granath [2022] EWHC 1181 (QB) by Lewis J. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 12 May 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Lee -v- Brown before Collins Rice J and MPL -v- WSZ before Saini J. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
Adams filled one (Trimble) and Hayes filled two (Harlan and Woods). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Woods testified that depending on the issues identified in the audits different courses of action may be followed. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:58 am by Steven P. Farmer and Mark Booth
Such goods include certain cement products, hydrocarbons, fertilisers, wood, glass products, aluminium, turbojets, and vessels. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 01743-21 Power v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 08762-21 Nita v edinburghnews, 14 Confidential sources (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 10375-21 Warde v Bridport & Lyme Regis News, 12 Discrimination (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 00505-22 Various v, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action… [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 12:09 pm by Scott McKeown
  [Patent Owner] submits that the PTAB has subpoena power that would have allowed [challenger] to obtain confidential information regarding the MAK System, if necessary. [read post]