Search for: "Bailey v. Bailey" Results 581 - 600 of 1,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
Between January and May 2013, the defendants were tried at the Old Bailey. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:40 am by tracey
Supreme Court Gnango, R. v [2011] UKSC 59 (14 December 2011) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor [2011] UKSC 60 (14 December 2011) Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKSC 58 (14 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Revenue And Customs v Lansdowne Partners Ltd Partnership [2011] EWCA Civ 1578 (20 December 2011) Ablyazov & Ors v JSC BTA Bank [2011] EWCA Civ 1588 (20 December 2011) Hosso… [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Last December, I reported on the Supreme Court of Kentucky's decision in Schnuerle v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:50 am by Mary L. Dudziak
  Legal history-related panels include:ThursdayConfiguring the Cold War: Constructive Courtroom Narratives in Dennis et al v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
IN RE COMMITMENT OF BAILEY The State filed a petition seeking to involuntarily civilly commit Arthur Lee Bailey, Jr. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
The second, by Walter Alexander Bailey, shows the former Watts Mill.A judge will address the group about landmark cases, likely including the Swope Park pool desegregation case, Williams v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 8:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The former governor of New York and other public officials may lose a civil rights lawsuit filed by sex offenders who claim that the state's civil confinement law violates the Due Process Clause.The case is Bailey v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 7:05 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
The appellant had been convicted of murder following an Old Bailey trial which had been held largely in camera (including the entirety of his defence case). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:44 pm
"It is well settled that the failure to file sworn proofs of loss within 60 days of the demand therefor constitutes an absolute defense to an action on an insurance policy absent a waiver of the requirement by the insurer or conduct on its part estopping its assertion of the defense' " (Bailey v Charter Oak Fire Ins. [read post]