Search for: "Bridges v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 1,136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
15 May 2020, 1:14 pm by NCC Staff
United States—a case arising from New Jersey officials creating traffic problems in the area represented by a political opponent by blocking bridge lanes—and says the Court’s unanimous decision that such actions are not federal crimes will make it harder to stop governmental corruption. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 8:12 am by Josh Blackman and Ilya Shapiro
United States: “[M]any of the previous programs were bridges from one legal status to another, whereas DAPA awards lawful presence to persons who have never had a legal status and may never receive one. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:56 am
United Cerebral Palsy has compiled a comprehensive Resource Guide for individuals with cerebral palsy in Colorado. [read post]
9 May 2021, 7:06 pm
  In 2017, even as the United States retreated from direct economic connections with Cuba, the European Union sought to step into the space left by the American action. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:23 am
Code defines "official proceeding" as "a proceeding before a judge or court of the United States", i.e., a federal civil or criminal case. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
The Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of Bridge v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:42 am by Zack Bluestone
    In other news… United States In a speech at Australian National University, U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 7:06 am by Jim Walker
The Department of Justice (DOJ) arrested him on charges of violating  Title 18 United States Code, Section 113(7) (assaults within maritime and territorial jurisdiction; assault resulting in a substantial bodily injury to a spouse or intimate partner). [read post]
24 May 2017, 10:46 am by Floyd Abrams
By the time the Court returned to the issue of when speech about pending judicial proceedings could constitutionally lead to a finding of contempt, in Bridges v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:39 am by SHG
  See United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 10:38 am by Peter Margulies
The Obama administration had initiated DACA to help the "Dreamers": foreign nationals who entered the United States as children, accompanying parents who entered the country unlawfully. [read post]