Search for: "Fisher v. District Court" Results 581 - 600 of 915
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2013, 8:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
The brief provided strong new backing for the admissions policy now used at the flagship Austin campus of the University of Texas – the same plan that the Supreme Court reviewed last Term, without settling its constitutionality, in the case of Fisher v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:40 am
DISTRICT COURTWESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment Court Rejects Hospital's Claim That LMRA Precluded Workers' FLSA Compensation Claims Hinterberger v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Last week, the parties finally met for trial in a Manhattan District Court before Judge Shira Scheindlin. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
   (1) Challenge to jury instructions was not preserved despite written request where counsel twice acknowledged agreement with the final instructions; (2) The trial court did not err by refusing to instruct the jury on manslaughter and perfect self-defense; (3) Trial court’s comments regarding the defendant’s theory of self-defense during charge conference were not improper; (4) The defendant could not show prejudice from the trial court’s… [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 10:27 pm
See Pfizer, 518 F.3d at 1367; (...)the district court also explicitly found that the prosecuting attorney (Tolomei) and one of the inventors (LeFebre) knew of the undisclosed RFO art. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
Fisher, where mention of the defendant’s right to confront witnesses was omitted. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
Prior to her appointment to the District Court, Judge O'Malley was First Assistant Attorney General and Chief of Staff to then-Ohio Attorney General Lee Fisher. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
The momentous decision was handed down by United States District Court Judge George H. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
  Indeed, as was confirmed by the oral argument last October in the still-pending case of Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm by Zachary Spilman
In Olano, the Supreme Court made it clear that “the [plain] error must have been prejudicial: It must have affected the outcome of the district court proceedings. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 11:56 am by David Lat
District Court for the Central District of California via Scribd] [read post]