Search for: "GILBERT v GILBERT" Results 581 - 600 of 1,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Board of Education, 1954, and related cases; andCases concerning elections and voting rights in the 1940s and 1950s with one Alabama primary election case, Gray v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
Still on the subject of patents, Penny Gilbert writes a guest piece on The SPC Blog on prospects for patent term extensions for veterinary vaccines in light of the EFTA Court ruling in Pharmaq v Intervet, while the same blog records a most unusual event these days -- an action concerning supplementary protection certificates which the trial judge refuses to send to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling (Viiv v Teva, here).The INTA is coming… [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
The Tenth Circuit held that, whether viewed as compelled speech or as a content-based restriction, the restriction had to – and did – satisfy strict scrutiny: Colorado could show that it has a compelling interest, and that the restriction is narrowly tailored to satisfy that interest (Reed v Town of Gilbert 576 US 155, 164 (2015)). [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:54 am
The Rule of Law and Constitutionalism in Fiji by George Williams, (Anthony Mason Professor and Director, Gilbert & Tobin Centre of Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales; Barrister, New South Wales Bar) The decision of the Court of Appeal of Fiji in Republic of Fiji v Prasad is a landmark in the development of the common law. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 1:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Chief Justice John Jay by Gilbert Stuart Jay was a committed federalist, notably setting forth his position in his opinion for Chisholm v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am by CMS
  (1)       For the shipowner to have given up a valuable right of a contribution in General Average in relation to well-known kidnap and ransom risks requires a clear agreement to that effect – Gilbert-Ash (Northern) Ltd v Modern Engineering (Bristol) Ltd [1974] AC 689, 717 [read post]