Search for: "GIST v. GIST" Results 581 - 600 of 963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
In defamation cases—where the gist of the claim is that the words at issue are alleged to be defamatory (that is, tending to injure the reputation) of the claimant and, as such, presumed to be false—the common law rule in Bonnard v Perryman has long governed the availability or, more accurately, the non-availability of interim injunctive relief. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 3:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
This is Nunes' latest libel lawsuit, just filed yesterday in Florida state court; I'm too slammed to write about it in detail, but I thought I'd pass along the Complaint (Nunes v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 10:53 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a March 27, 2023 post found here, we wrote about the Second District Court of Appeal’s (Div. 1) decision concerning the Water Code section 13389 CEQA exemption for Regional Water Quality Control Board (“RWQCB”) issuance of waste discharge permits, formerly published as Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:12 pm
When the Supreme Court refused to grant cert in Sorich v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:44 am by Russ Bensing
  Doesn’t matter, says the 8th District:  “the gist of the theft offense is the wrongful taking by the defendant, not the particular ownership of the property”… The 9th District reverses the defendant’s conviction for intimidation of a crime victim, finding in State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 5:26 pm by Myers Freelance
The gist of it is simple: Buy search engine ads for search queries that are clearly designed to find your competitors. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:30 am by Michael O'Hear
I had not seen this dimension addressed in an appellate decision before, but the Seventh Circuit did so last week in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by David Bernstein
The gist of the piece is that Hammer wasn’t a battle between laissez-faireists and Progressive supporters of national regulation. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
The gist of the complaint is that as the pandemic, Danaher failed to disclose that as the pandemic evolved, the company’s pandemic-related revenue growth was declining and that the company overstated its ability to continue the growth the company had experienced in 2020 and 2021. [read post]