Search for: "Harrison v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
Harrison, No. 07-55429 "In a habeas corpus case, grant of a habeas petition due to unconstitutionally constituted jury is affirmed where the petitioner made a strong prima facie showing of discriminatory intent in the pattern of the prosecutor's striking of potential jurors and the state offered no non-speculative evidence of non-discriminatory intent in jury selection. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:54 am
” Moreover, relying on Harrison v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:42 am
Moreover, in Harrison v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am
See Harrison v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
The FT Group’s Chief Executive stated that it is right, “that AI platforms pay publishers for the use of their material. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
United States A Florida judge has denied an attempt by the former T-Mobile chief executive John Legere to dismiss a $100m defamation suit brought again [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 12:50 pm
Although there was a drop off in such cases for the 2017 term, the court heard several salient patent cases last term as well, with Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
On 13 March 2024 there was a Pre-Trial Review in the case of Harrison v Cameron QB-2022-002468. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
Another case last Term, United States v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 10:53 am
In the recent case of Depuy Orthopaedics v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:38 am
Supreme Court’s groundbreaking decision in Graham v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 1:30 pm
Bernick stated he would have about 30 minutes of questions left for Marsden. - Noelle Harrison (April 17, 2009) (2:30 p.m.) [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:54 am
Bs Thornton pointed out that in 2020, the High Court had ruled (in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin) at [111]) that the failure to provide humanist marriages in England and Wales was discriminatory and the Government could not simply “sit on its hands” and do nothing – to which Lord Ponsonby responded, not unreasonably, that “the previous Government chose not to respond to the Law Commission report, and… [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
The High Court agreed in R (Harrison) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin) that the current lack of provision for legal humanist weddings in England and Wales was in breach of Article 9 ECHR. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:30 am
Betül Durmuş, Strasbourg Observers: Cupiał v Poland: what could this case offer on religious upbringing? [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 10:01 pm
State, 840 P.2d 912, 914 n.3 (Wyo. 1992). [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 10:01 pm
State, 840 P.2d 912, 914 n.3 (Wyo. 1992). [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 10:01 pm
State, 840 P.2d 912, 914 n.3 (Wyo. 1992). [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm
See also Georgia State Bar Rules, DR 7-102(A)(3), (4) and (5); DR 7-106(C) (1); Rule 4-102(d) Standard 45 and O.C.G.A. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Harrison, 961 F.3d 654 (June 8, 2020) In this 42 U.S.C. [read post]
