Search for: "IN RE GRANT" Results 581 - 600 of 37,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 2:54 am by Madeline Reardon, 1 Kings Bench Walk.
This week the Supreme Court has been hearing an appeal from the Court of Appeal in Re E (Children.) [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 5:51 am
""Denton County developed a new program called the TARMAC Program (Take Action, Re-Integrate, Make A Change). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by Rantanen
  If the initiation of re-exams is largely a function of litigation, there is a soft cap on the number of potential reexams that will be initiated. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:14 pm
"[A]re the Alabama sturgeon and the shovelnose sturgeon separate species? [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:01 am by Jamie Markham
The case, In re Hamilton, considered a trial court’s refusal to grant a petition because granting it would not comply with the federal Jacob Wetterling Act, as amended, and other [...] [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 am by koherston
They entered an agreed parenting plan designating Mother as the primary residential parent and granting Father 74 days of parenting time. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:45 am
This is an appeal against a refusal by the Northern Ireland High Court and Court of Appeal ([2010] NICA 13) to grant a declaration that inquests into the killings of the Appellants’ next of kin by British security forces were required to comply with the requirements of Article 2 ECHR. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 2:52 am by Immigration Prof
Ingrid Eagly blogged about the case when the Court granted certiorari, In her preview of the case for SCOTUSBlog, Jennifer Koh... [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:13 am
Citizens or nationals of Haiti under a grant of Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, are required to re-register during the applicable re-registration period in order to maintain their protected status. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:31 pm
By contrast, Patent Docs, pushing their particular subjective and outdated view of biotechnology patents, still doesn't get it, assigning multiple errors to the Federal Circuit court rather than trying to formulate a workable understanding of the rule now applied in In re Kubin and applicable to the grant or denial of all biotechnology patents in the future. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
Does anyone really believe that Jim Hood wanted to overturn the pardons granted by the former governor because he was appalled that the newspapers had said nothing about the pardons until after they were granted? [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Rogers, Jr. issued Order No. 17 granting-in-part Respondents Zhejiang Medicine Co., Ltd. and ZMC-USA LLC’s (collectively, “Respondents”) motion to compel in Certain Coenzyme Q10 Products and Methods of Making Same (Inv. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 10:43 am by Allison Garrett
Judge Alsup of the N.D. of California issued a decision on April 11 in In re CNET Networks, Inc. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:20 pm by Patent Docs
And sometimes the shadow of the Court's impending decision, like an unobserved new planet or dark star bends the appellate court's decisions in ways consistent with the likely view of the law expected to issue from the Court (because the Supreme Court rarely grants certiorari in an appeal from a Federal Circuit decision just to affirm). [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 8:34 am
Karatz acknowledges and agrees that the exercise price of each annual stock option granted to him since October 2, 1998 (the "Subject Options") shall be changed to the closing price per share of the Company's common stock on the new measurement dates selected by KB [...] [read post]