Search for: "Jack Goldsmith"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,662
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2018, 11:58 am
On the whole, as Jack Goldsmith noted in June, the Supreme Court has continued to “turn down the temperature” concerning the travel ban litigation. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:01 am
Jack Goldsmith summed up the Court’s decision in six letters on Twitter: ATS, RIP. https://t.co/Dn6gGFZdYh — Jack Goldsmith (@jacklgoldsmith) April 24, 2018 Like Goldsmith, I come to the Jesner decision having previously written about various aspects of ATS litigation (including a 2008 article on choice of law under the ATS and a later exploration of transitory torts, as well as shorter contributions on functional, political, and economic… [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 9:08 am
This from Jack Goldsmith, professor of law at Harvard, not some RW journo-advocate. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 6:04 am
Jack Goldsmith and Oona Hathaway argued that there is neither domestic nor international legal authority for the U.S. airstrikes in Syria. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
My friends Jack Goldsmith and Oona Hathaway published two essays in which they expertly propound what I must concede is probably the opinion of many if not most scholars: that the recent strikes on Syria violated both domestic and international law. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:13 am
I The first time I had lunch with James Comey at the FBI, it was still early in his tenure as director. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:43 am
Jack Goldsmith argued that constitutional law and international law share similar uncertainties about the meaning and efficacy of war powers. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
The lack of an authorization by the United Nations is an accurate criticism, thoughtfully explained in posts by Laurie Blank, Jack Goldsmith, and Oona Hathaway here on Lawfare. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 11:50 am
Jack Goldsmith and Oona Hathaway argued that there is no domestic or international legal authority for the U.S. airstrikes in Syria. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm
In their post earlier today, Jack Goldsmith and Oona Hathaway argue that the Trump administration had no apparent domestic or international legal authority for last night’s air strikes against Syria. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 5:51 am
Jack Goldsmith examined the cycles of panicked reactions to Trump’s threats to dismiss senior Justice Department officials. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:34 pm
Jack Goldsmith has mapped “the cycles of panicked reactions” to fears that Trump might fire Rosenstein, Mueller or Attorney General Jeff Sessions. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:34 pm
Jack Goldsmith has mapped “the cycles of panicked reactions” to fears that Trump might fire Rosenstein, Mueller or Attorney General Jeff Sessions. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:13 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jack Goldsmith examined the cycles of panicked reactions to President Trump’s threats to remove senior Justice Department officials. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 1:32 pm
Jack Goldsmith and Oona Hathaway offered five legal and practical downsides to bombing Syria in response to the chemical weapons attack on Douma. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 11:16 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jack Goldsmith argued that it is not clear whether Special Counsel Robert Mueller has the authority to prepare an interim report or if such a report would make it to Congress or the public. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 8:58 pm
Jack Goldsmith and Prof. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 6:42 am
And Kahn shared the Lawfare Podcast, a conversation between Jack Goldsmith and Amy Chua about her new book, “Political Tribes: Group Instinct and the Fate of Nations”: And that was the week that was. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 11:17 am
Matthew Kahn posted the Lawfare Podcast, in which Jack Goldsmith interviews Niall Ferguson about Ferguson’s new book, “The Square and the Tower: Networks, Hierarchies and the Struggle for Power. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
At the Hoover Institution earlier this month, Ferguson spoke to Jack Goldsmith about why historians have glossed over networks, the rightful place of networks in the study of history, and what the modern dominance of social networks means for the future of power. [read post]
