Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 581 - 600
of 601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
The grant in Jardines drew coverage from Bloomberg News, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, the Christian Science Monitor, BBC, Wired, the Hawaii News Daily, the Huffington Post, the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, and the Associated Press, Reuters; Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences weighs in on the merits (as did Orin Kerr of the Volokh Conspiracy back in late December). [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses McCoy and today’s other criminal-law opinions. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 10:08 am
[Discusses another case and makes the DPIC neutrality claim]About 19 minutes in:Rehm: Kent Scheidegger, what about the number of people who are on death row or who have already suffered the death penalty and been found not guilty.Scheidegger: Let's go back and look at the answer to your question earlier about Debra Milke. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:01 am
And Liu’s presence would only push the already-liberal court further to the left, said Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which seeks to ensure the “swift and certain punishment” of people who are guilty of committing crimes.And:Meanwhile, Jonathan Singer, a student of Liu’s who runs a Web site dedicated to Liu’s confirmation, dismisses the conservatives’ concerns over Liu’s nomination. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:20 am
"But victim's rights advocate Kent S. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
" And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger highlights the issues at stake in Beard v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 1:59 am
"Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the pro-death penalty Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, acknowledged that capital punishment cases generally do cost more than other cases because of the lengthy legal reviews. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that “[a] great deal of post-conviction litigation in capital cases consists of claims that some marginally relevant mitigating evidence, often with no connection to the crime, was erroneously omitted from the sentencing process,” and that “[a]llowing the state collateral review court to say ‘even assuming that was an error, the aggravating still outweighs the mitigating, and the sentence is still… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
” Kent Scheidegger discusses the ruling at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds with enthusiasm to the Court’s decision to “clean up one of the messier areas of its jurisprudence” in taking up the case, and he expresses hope that the Court will rule “broadly and correctly,” in his view, to narrow and to simplify the litigation process. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:13 am
"Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the pro-death penalty Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, acknowledged that capital punishment cases generally do cost more than other cases because of the lengthy legal reviews. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:09 am
Schwartz quotes our friend Kent Scheidegger on what will happen if Baird gets to rule and says Willingham was innocent. [read post]
Argument preview: What can a federal habeas petitioner argue when defending a judgment in his favor?
14 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
” CJLF’s national legal director, Kent Scheidegger, has tirelessly filed amicus briefs in many major capital cases, advocating speedier affirmance, and quicker (or no) federal review, of state death penalty judgments. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses petitions that didn't make the order list this morning. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
” Kent Scheidegger looks at the decision at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:55 am
Today’s Community discussion deals with the Supreme Court’s relationship to businesses. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:54 am
For more on this, check out Kent Scheidegger on Crime and Consequences and Doug Berman on Sentencing Law and Policy. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences writes, "Despite all the wailing and gnashing of teeth . . ., the holding is not all that remarkable. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:34 am
Each week, we will have one Community topic of special interest to law students supported by Bloomberg Law. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences writes, "Despite all the wailing and gnashing of teeth . . ., the holding is not all that remarkable. [read post]
