Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
Readers may recall I once blogged about a similar case, United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 am
Lord Kerr (dissenting) in a poignant judgement raised a number of issues with his fellow Lord’s reasoning. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 5:39 pm
(As the Court stated in Kerr [v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has this post on the Court's decision in Los Angeles County v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:25 am
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:22 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Alabama Department of Revenue, which asks whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors from a generally applicable sales tax constitutes discrimination against railroads; and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:30 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:45 pm
Just to pick one example, in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:23 am
With the Court’s winter recess underway, commentators continue their discussion of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
United States, 425 U.S. at 394–95, 96 S. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:31 am
” Writing for the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein critiques the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:46 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 1:09 pm
See Lopez v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:53 am
Listed this morning for half a day in Courtroom 2 is the appeal of Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department, to be heard by L Hale, L Kerr, L Reed, L Toulson and L Hodge. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
See DePriest v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
15.56 Lord Mance asks if it would be a “catastrophe” for the devolution settlement if the legislative consent convention was not legally binding. 15.55 In response to questions from Lord Mance and Lord Kerr, the Lord Advocate notes that, in the current constitutional context, the UK Parliament has committed itself in statute to seeking the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament on “devolved matters”. 15.50 The two Scottish Justices – Lord Reed… [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 5:54 pm
In a 2006 decision in State of Utah v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:35 am
Kansas don’t need no stinkin’ rule, and in Kahler v. [read post]
