Search for: "Marty Lederman"
Results 581 - 593
of 593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court agreed to hear a high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case from Wisconsin, Gill v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 11:08 pm
The Appellate Court disagreed.Compelled to be a Witness against HimselfRob Leonard notes that 30 hours of police interrogation can easily produce false confessions – in this case, one that lead to wrongful imprisonment for 22 years.The opposite of “not being compelled to be a witness against yourself” is often “interrogation” or “torture,” and Marty Lederman collects a compendium of Op-Ed pieces on… [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 11:03 am
You are now using the new SCOTUSblog, which internally we call “SCOTUSblog 4.0. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
For the administration to claim, as Marty Lederman reports here, that IS nonetheless remains subject to the 2001 AUMF both because of this past and because IS though now independent in some fashion claims to be the “true inheritor” of “bin Laden’s legacy” (and because AQAP and other AQ associated forces have made ambiguous statements, for whatever reason, applauding IS’s claims and achievements) is just stunning from a legal perspective. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
This is the year of the RFRA, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
In advance of those filings, the blog will be publishing a series of posts by Marty Lederman of the Georgetown University Law Center on the Article III questions the Court has asked the parties to address in the two cases. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:25 pm
Finally, as Marty Lederman has noted - very astutely in my view - the concept of immunity (or more precisely, impunity) for the executive and its agents plays an increasingly potent role in this process. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
(And no, I’m not referring the Court’s decision to add a fourth question regarding the Take Care Clause of Article II; as Marty Lederman and others have explained, the Court had reason to add that question even if it has no intention of going Texas’s way on the constitutional issue.) [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
In advance of those filings, the blog will be publishing a series of posts by Marty Lederman of the Georgetown University Law Center on the Article III questions the Court has asked the parties to address in the two cases. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
” Many in this group are graduates of this law school: My special assistant and Navy reservist Brodi Kemp, who is here with me today (class of ‘04); Caroline Krass at OLC (class of ’93); Dan Koffsky at OLC (class of ’78); Marty Lederman, formerly of OLC (class of ‘88); Greg Craig, the former White House Counsel (class of ’72); Bob Litt, General Counsel of ODNI (class of ‘76); Retired Marine Colonel Bill Lietzau (class of ’89);… [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
In advance of those filings, the blog will be publishing a series of posts by Marty Lederman of the Georgetown University Law Center on the Article III questions the Court has asked the parties to address in the two cases. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In advance of those filings, the blog will be publishing a series of posts by Marty Lederman of the Georgetown University Law Center on the Article III questions the Court has asked the parties to address in the two cases. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 8:21 am
[A Reply to Critics] By Randy E. [read post]
