Search for: "People v. Howes"
Results 581 - 600
of 31,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 10:46 am
Peake, et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 12:49 pm
See Related Posts:Back to the Basics: SSI v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:40 am
It dodges, in a very nice way, the question of how much of a [...] [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:49 pm
People v. my client- It is not every day a DWI criminal complaint gets dismissed based upon facial insufficiency grounds. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
Great demonstration of initiative.I also liked how the Court of Appeal ended its opinion: by remanding the case and ordering the completion of the Prop. 47 hearing within 45 days. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
It's interesting how all the various rights line up here. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:04 pm
No downside if you get it wrong.Just remember how to count. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:05 pm
’ My question is, and it’s not going to happen, but if the District Attorney or somebody said, ‘I need you to come and tell your story to court,’ how would you feel? [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 9:37 am
Defendant estimated he was driving 45 miles per hour at this point, but Emery testified that she was going 70 miles per hour.Though defendant could not see beyond the truck, did not know whether there were more cars in front of it, and could not tell how much space there was between Emery and the truck, he decided to pull into the westbound lane and pass both vehicles. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:51 pm
Reasonable minds might well disagree as to both (1) how much of a concern suffices to create an exception to the warrant requirement, as well as (2) whether that standard, whatever it is, was satisfied here.But at least for me, I think that the circumstances here were sufficiently unusual -- and in a way that I could easily imagine would result in a person in distress being in the home -- to create at least a non-trivial (i.e., real) risk that the officers would enter the home… [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
The guy can't be tried again for the same offense.You see why the Court of Appeal comes out that way.That said, I wonder how those principles really apply to prosecutions that, as here, involve "status" charges. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
The general manager testified that it struck him “[h]ow calmly and slowly the person . . . came in the building and how familiar it appeared to be to them,” as they “kn[ew] exactly where to go to commit the armed robbery, where the money would be and on what floor. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
How should overtime pay be calculated? [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
How should overtime pay be calculated? [read post]
9 May 2009, 3:24 pm
Brodsky v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:20 pm
The question is only how -- and how much -- he should be punished for it.He's got no criminal record. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 10:26 am
I did not know much about the United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
People don't do anything without reasons. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 11:39 am
When he spent time rooting around in Henderson‘s trunk, trying to find a fishing knife that she told him was not there, Henderson got the feeling defendant was 'stalling.' Throughout this time, he kept repeating, with increasing anger, 'So this is how you want it, huh? [read post]
