Search for: "People v. Wells"
Results 581 - 600
of 27,427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 12:23 pm
It's instead that the predicate assumptions, as well as the mode of analysis, is just so obviously antiquated to contemporary, more informed readers. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:39 am
And yet we spend time, effort and money -- on both the Attorney General's side as well as on the public defender's side and in the Court of Appeal -- to litigate and attempt to defend this clearly invalid provision.Confessing error is a good thing -- indeed, often a very good thing -- on occasion. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 10:57 pm
You may well be making a big, big, big mistake.Don't believe me? [read post]
17 May 2007, 12:51 pm
For the parents of the victims as well. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:06 am
Plus, assuming good behavior, the guy who actually committed the murder may well be out by then, since he got 25 to life as part of his plea deal. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:17 pm
Have your incriminating conversation about the first-degree murder you committed, well, somewhere else. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:03 pm
But I wanted to make a couple of additional points as well. [read post]
6 May 2008, 12:57 pm
It's well-reasoned. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:04 am
(Though a curative instruction on this point to the jury seems appropriate as well.) [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
We apparently don't use that term as much here in California as elsewhere, even though many many other states use it, and it also appears in CJS as well as in a wide variety of other treatises.)Regardless, the term's now been used in a California case, right? [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:33 pm
Then, just for fun, steal $20 out of her bra, as well as, once you're in the midst of this whole process, kidnap her in order to get an extra $700 that you realize she has at her grandmother's house?! [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:47 pm
But I didn't know until today that another way you can get yourself shot is by wearing your hair the wrong way; for example, here, "in a style favored by [Vasquez's rival gang] as well as by his own. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 9:28 am
. - I tend to think that I'm reasonably well-informed as to various legal -- and non-legal -- terms. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:48 am
So now Ebaniz gets a new trial on those as well.Sometimes, when you're a DA, you've gotta leave well enough alone. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:57 pm
The trial court's error (Judge Genesta, in L.A.) was perhaps a little understandable as well -- it seems facially silly, after all, to allow such a crazy verdict --but it's nonetheless clear error regardless.Can't do that. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:35 pm
Here, it's reasonable to assume that there's something fishy going on, and that M.D. might well be in trouble. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:50 pm
It may well be that there was no error here and hence the California Supremes would have unanimously affirmed in any event. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
Litigators know only too well the problems with doctrine and the courts’ composition that keep holding them back, but they imagine a silver bullet exists in the legislative arena, which they know far less well. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
His discussion of NAACP v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 1:19 pm
You might think it's only applicable (if at all) to people who actually steal property. [read post]
