Search for: "Power v. California Bank"
Results 581 - 600
of 792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
When the bank fails, the FDIC takes over, seeks to recoup the money the bank was owed. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
Clear coverage: Transunion v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Kirby Professor of Investment Banking Fuqua School of Business Professor of Law Duke University J. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
On March 22nd, Professor Baker was the featured speaker at the Northern California Association of Law Libraries’ Spring Institute in San Francisco, California. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:54 am
If these provisions were placed in the articles of incorporation of a California company, the California Secretary of State would reject the articles on the theory that this gives the Series A director more power than other directors. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Department of Water Resources (2022) 13 Cal.5th 612 The California Supreme Court held that the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) is partially preempted by the Federal Power Act (“FPA”), reversing in part a Court of Appeal ruling that CEQA is fully preempted. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:42 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the court’s denial of a petition filed by Scott Patrick, an Oregon man who was convicted in 2000 of an unarmed bank robbery. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Johnson forAmici Curiae United Trustee’s Association and California Mortgage Association.Leland Chan for Amicus Curiae California Bankers Association.I. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:56 am
BakkeIn Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
And those aren't my words, they're Justice Rehnquist's in U.S. v Security Industries Bank. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:06 pm
On the other hand, it represents a major shift in the balance of power over building and land use regulation. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
Jones Case Page Amicus Brief of EFF, CDT and Technical Experts in Support of Jones (EFF’s amicus brief) Riley v California and United States v Wurie Case Page EFF Amicus Brief in Support of Riley and Wurie (EFF) Riley-Wurie Supreme Court Opinions (SCOTUS opinion) Supreme Court Sets Powerful Limited for Cell Searches, Fails to Protect Internet Streaming (EFF) Carpenter v United States Case Page EFF Amicus Brief for Carpenter… [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics
1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor
Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment
1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William
On Conveyancers' Evidence
1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas
On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu) Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu) Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto (jacq.briggs@utoronto.ca)John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jowertheimer@davidson.eduLaw and Empire in the Sino-Asian Context (Harvard Law School / TBD)12:00 PM – 4:30 PMLegal History and the Persistent Power of State and Local Governments (Cambridge Room)Moderators: Brooke… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 6:23 pm
, but hey, now he can dance all the way to the bank! [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
CLS Bank in Patent Examination, 2014 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
