Search for: "Richards v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 4,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2014, 12:54 pm
United States and whether a treaty can increase the legislative power of Congress — is available here. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a double jeopardy case, comes from Rory Little for this blog. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
            Despite the asymmetry between the two books, two concerns unite them that deserve critical treatment. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:51 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Sunstein, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:06 am by David Markus
Leon’s 46-page ruling in United States District Court in Washington reopens the district’s long fight over how much room the Second Amendment’s guarantee of the right to bear arms leaves for local regulation — and whether it applies only to firearms in the home, or to guns carried outside as well.The law gave the police the discretion to grant concealed-carry licenses only to those with “good reason to fear injury” or other specific reasons, such… [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Thole v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am by Jan von Hein
  On May 7, 2024, Advocate General Jean Richard de la Tour delivered his opinion in the case C-4/23, Mirin, concerning the recognition in one Member State of a change of gender obtained in another Member State by a citizen of both States. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm by Sheppard Mullin
PSKS, Inc.,[1] the United States Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 vote to overrule the long-lived rule in Dr. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 10:46 am
(11th Cir. ( Va.), May 14, 2009) The policies at issue limited coverage to the United States and Canada, the policyholder argued that claims regarding negligent hiring happened in the United States. [read post]