Search for: "Scales v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 2,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2018, 10:03 am by Andrew Crocker
In a case currently in front of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:55 am by Clara Spera
But, in an apparent blow to NSA, United States District Court Judge Jeffrey White has denied the Justice Department’s request to suspend legal action in the case of First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 11:59 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Clapper, the government acknowledged (in a footnote) that the law "confers authority for collecting the contents of wire communications to or from a person in the United States." [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:37 pm
” The case, McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
By comparing and contrasting United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:07 am by Joey Fishkin
United States, courts reasoned that large company-wide statistical disparities had to come from somewhere. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am by INFORRM
And he was Chief Executive of one the largest publicly quoted companies in the United Kingdom, doing business on a global scale. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 66.8 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:46 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by Cindy Cohn
United States: When the United States Supreme Court quotes you in upholding privacy, that’s a big win. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Seamus Hughes, Devorah Margolin
Conventional wisdom would suggest that the homegrown jihadist threat will regress back to its pre-Islamic State scale. [read post]