Search for: "Scales v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 2,619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am by INFORRM
And he was Chief Executive of one the largest publicly quoted companies in the United Kingdom, doing business on a global scale. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by Cindy Cohn
United States: When the United States Supreme Court quotes you in upholding privacy, that’s a big win. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Seamus Hughes, Devorah Margolin
Conventional wisdom would suggest that the homegrown jihadist threat will regress back to its pre-Islamic State scale. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:19 am by Michael O'Hear
The federal sentencing story, like the more general story of mass incarceration in the United States, likely involves a complex interplay of many causal factors. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:59 am by Susan Brenner
Constitution states that `The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
The United States was founded on a contradiction: all men are created equal; our Constitution enshrines slavery. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
The ongoing ransomware attack across Europe, the United States, and Asia has raised concerns over the growing frequency of large-scale cyberattacks, The New York Times writes. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:25 am by Terry Hart
Be sure to catch the follow up, Further Thoughts on Infringement as Conversion, for a discussion about the impact (or lack thereof) of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dowling v United States on the analysis. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am by SHG
In a delightfully titled post that gets the joke backwards,* Pigs get fed, hogs get slaughtered [sic],  Judge Richard Kopf poses the question that arose in the Third Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Where a state breaches the ECHR, a Court set up by signatory members – the European Court of Human Rights (which has nothing to do with the European Union) – can order a state to pay an aggrieved citizen compensation. [read post]