Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 581 - 600
of 5,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2021, 4:05 pm
As I and the courts predicted after the Bolger v Amazon case this would accelerate Amazon's process of passing the "product liability" cost along to its sellers and forcing them to get coverage. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 12:15 am
Lucky Lucy D LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am
Even with this in mind, the CJEU has been set up to answer the question of whether platforms like Amazon can have any liability in relation to the misuse of trademarks by sellers and handed down their judgment on this topic only a few weeks ago.The case of Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl concerned the sale of knock-off Davidoff perfume on Amazon. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am
Even with this in mind, the CJEU has been set up to answer the question of whether platforms like Amazon can have any liability in relation to the misuse of trademarks by sellers and handed down their judgment on this topic only a few weeks ago.The case of Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl concerned the sale of knock-off Davidoff perfume on Amazon. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
For example, in Syvrud v. [read post]
7 May 2025, 7:00 am
(Starker v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 7:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 7:55 am
Amazon * Online Marketplace Defeats Trademark Suit Because It’s Not the “Seller”–OSU v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:16 pm
" Lefever v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:34 am
Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 2:59 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:28 pm
Ohio’s economic nexus standard is the same as that at issue in South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
The Court of Appeals says it's constitutional.The case is Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:31 am
Dukes v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:01 pm
See Glidepath, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 10:09 pm
See: Nacoochee Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:12 pm
The Court of Justice held in Case C-404/06 Quelle AG v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände, that Directive 1999/44/EC on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees precludes national legislation under which a seller who has sold consumer goods which are not in conformity may require the consumer to pay compensation for the use of those defective goods until their replacement with new goods. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 9:32 am
In Spade v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 6:53 am
Here are the materials in Smith v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 6:40 am
These cases are Lafferty v. [read post]
