Search for: "State v. Kent" Results 581 - 600 of 1,544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 28 January, the Supreme Court will hear the case of CPRE Kent v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am by Conor McEvily
”  At the blog Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger describes the argument in Greene – involving a question of timing under the federal habeas statute – as “[going] well for the State. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
Oral arguments in King v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Amy Howe
Next week’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:10 am
UNITED STATES | Questions Presented 06-1646 UNITED STATES V. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
In the latest episode of The World and Everything In It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:41 am by Amy Howe
News) reports that Bobby Chen, the pro se petitioner in Chen v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 4:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 at 816-817 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Escape Airports [USA], Inc. v Kent, Beatty & Gordon, LLP, 79 AD3d 437, 438 [1st Dept 2010]). [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that “[w]henever the Supreme Court makes a significant change in the law — as it did last week when it overruled its prior approval of nonunanimous juries in state criminal cases” in Ramos v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
There is still more commentary on Friedrichs v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]