Search for: "State v. Baker" Results 581 - 600 of 3,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2008, 12:50 pm
On a night when CAAF released its blockbuster opinion in Lopez de Victoria, we can't expect many people to want to go see the small indie release of United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am by Derek Muller
” So wrote Justice Felix Frankfurter in his dissenting opinion in Baker v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 10:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But Sisyphean though it might be, Keyssar’s new book should enjoy the same status as his Pulitzer-finalist work, The Right to Vote (2000), which appeared just in time to appear as a visual prop over James Baker’s shoulder in his first Meet the Press appearance after the election. [read post]
30 May 2017, 11:58 am by Amy Howe
But for the 11th conference in a row, the justices did not act on a Colorado baker’s First Amendment challenge to the state’s public accommodations law. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 7:09 pm
The blawgosphere has been buzzing about the supposed death of punitive damages in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:52 am by Steven Cohen
Baker – United States District Court – Middle District of Louisiana – June 4th, 2019) involves a claim of misappropriation of trade secrets. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:57 am
Baker, which originated from the infamous spill that occured almost two decades ago. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:16 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Nursing home workers condemn Baker budget cuts, July 14, 2016, By Kay Lazar, The Boston Globe More Blog Entries: Nickerson v. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by Larry
Court of International Trade denied a government motion to dismiss PrimeSource Building Products, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Congress and state governments almost certainly will be forced to deal with these broader challenges regardless of the outcome of King v. [read post]