Search for: "State v. Core"
Results 581 - 600
of 7,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2022, 9:34 am
I'm still going through the decision, in Netchoice v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 7:46 pm
Revel, Enzo v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:50 am
... is at the core of Jonathan Sumption QC’s FA Mann Lecture. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 4:35 pm
Yours truly was privileged to co-sign an amicus brief in the SEC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:17 am
The case of Ricky Lee Allshouse v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:17 am
Severance v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Such an argument challenges what the Solicitor General aptly describes as “the very core of Congress’s power under the Spending Clause and the Appropriations Clause to specify the criteria under which funds in the treasury will be paid out and spent. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 3:43 am
Oregon, and its impending decision in the fascinating case of Medellin v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 11:12 am
In Texas v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:55 am
NYPPP alleges that "the cap violates its core First Amendment right to advocate in favor of Joseph Lhota in the upcoming mayoral election." [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 11:20 am
Over at Lawfare, I have a long post criticizing the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm
Dagenhart, United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Consider the core patent in the Apple v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 8:28 am
[Title 18] § 922(g)(5) does not burden this core right, because the prohibition applies only to those who are present in the United States "illegally or unlawfully. [read post]
Justices reverse Wisconsin court ruling that increased majority-Black districts in state legislature
23 Mar 2022, 6:34 pm
The ruling in Grothman v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
In the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) Nicol J held that a Government Press Release which meant that the claimant, Dr Salman Butt, was an extremist hate speaker constituted a statement of opinion, not of fact. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
The key conclusion which the Judge comes to is that the state of the law on this issue is currently ‘uncertain and in flux’, and so ‘probably requires the attention of an appellate court’ ([107]). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:23 am
Williams will hear oral arguments in Aamer v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:12 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:35 pm
Dreeben also stated there are parts of acting as president that Congress cannot criminalize, which make up the executive’s core duties. [read post]
