Search for: "State v. Square" Results 581 - 600 of 5,930
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2011, 4:26 pm
  To put it differently, if I were writing on a blank slate, I'd hold that there's federal Article III standing, but it nonetheless seems to me that such a position can't  be reasonably squared with the Supreme Court's decision in Arizonans for Official Language v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:34 am
The district court held that instead of putting limits on the number of square feet of facilities for which the state would provide funding, the state should have chosen a less onerous method of encouraging districts to eliminate excess square footage. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:34 am
The district court held that instead of putting limits on the number of square feet of facilities for which the state would provide funding, the state should have chosen a less onerous method of encouraging districts to eliminate excess square footage. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
The same year Kirschenblatt was released, Klugherz squared off against Harlan in another appeal, that being Horowitz v. [read post]
The state of New York, in an emergency session Friday, passed a new gun law in response to the US Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:13 am by Robert Chesney
True, Justice Anthony Kennedy in Boumediene v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:41 pm by Evan Lee
On Tuesday, April 26, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Mathis v. [read post]