Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 581 - 600 of 1,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Murphy plugged the phone into the office computer and was able to take a screenshot of the photographs on the phone. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:28 am by Susan Brenner
Many conform to the traditional version of the offense. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:58 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Northern District of California 2010). [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:53 am by Susan Brenner
As I explained in those posts, theft is taking someone’s property without their permission; it becomes robbery if you use force to take the property. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:00 am
Prosecutors, like judges, must be free to do their jobs without fear of being sued later, the high court said in the case of Imbler v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 2:56 am by Florian Mueller
They submitted an app that was supposedly just about news from Georgia Tech, but inside the Trojan Horse--the researchers preferred the term "Jekyll app"--there were "dormant" code segments that could take control over your phone and generate tweets, text messages, or emails, or could take pictures without you even knowing. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:27 am by John C. Manoog III
Violation of this law is punishable by a fine of $100 for a first offense, by a fine of $250 for a second offense, and by a fine of $500 for a third or subsequent offense. [read post]