Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes" Results 581 - 600 of 712
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by INFORRM
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD810 .M63 v. 7Elizabeth Cooke, ed., Modern Studies in Property Law (Oxford: Hart Pub., 2013). [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The California judge who ruled on Findley v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
These attacks included a Daily Mail front page which described three high court judges as “enemies of the people. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 7:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Relatedly: probabilistic reasoning: a private plaintiff can win if a substantial number are likely to be deceived, which can be as low as 15%; in a class action, courts think it has to be presumed that 100% are deceived, and they don’t seem happy with numbers that low although they might be willing to go with 40% or 50% Hughes: Surveys aren’t scrutinized for whether they selected reasonable consumers—which affects the “empirical” claim. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  This year's was on blue-sky laws, with just a glimpse of New Deal securities regulation and the Hughes Court. [read post]