Search for: "U. S. v. Banning" Results 581 - 600 of 776
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm by Steve Vladeck
  The Times complains that the NDAA “ban[s] . . . spending any money for civilian trials for any accused terrorist,” “strip[s] the F.B.I., federal prosecutors and federal courts of all or most of their power to arrest and prosecute terrorists,” and “give[s] future presidents the authority to throw American citizens into prison for life without charges or a trial. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Marty Lederman
  The Times complains that the NDAA “ban[s] . . . spending any money for civilian trials for any accused terrorist,” “strip[s] the F.B.I., federal prosecutors and federal courts of all or most of their power to arrest and prosecute terrorists,” and “give[s] future presidents the authority to throw American citizens into prison for life without charges or a trial. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In early October, the Court held in Phelps-Roper v City of Manchester (5 October, 2011) that the Missouri town of Manchester was not entitled to enforce a law banning peaceful picketing outside of funerals. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:12 am by Michael Froomkin
Indeed, LottoGopher’s description of its services seems drafted to route around Champion v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:58 pm by nflatow
We won a favorable judgment two years later from a federal district judge who held the military’s ban violated the equal protection and due process guarantees of the U. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:30 am by Adam Steinman
” This apparent ban on appellate review has generated an awkward line of cases, beginning with Thermtron Products v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Judge Phillips’ ruling is under review by the Ninth Circuit in the case of Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
    If the ban continues to be lifted under a federal court’s order, the Administration’s brief said, that would in effect be in defiance of the wishes of the political branches, in passing the repeal ban with its stretched-out implementation timetable. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:22 am by William Morriss
S. 476, 483 (1957), incitement, Brandenburg v. [read post]