Search for: "United States v. North Carolina"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
United States, and readers should expect a blog post on the case soon. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:01 pm
The only North Carolina Court of Appeals decision recognizing such a claim, Blow v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 5:53 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
David Thompson, arguing on behalf of the North Carolina legislature, conceded for the sake of argument that the North Carolina Supreme Court gave North Carolina statutes and the North Carolina Constitution a permissible interpretation, regardless of what standard SCOTUS uses in these cases to review a state court's application of state law--whether the completely deferential test federal courts routinely… [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 5:48 am
Earlier this year, the North Carolina Court of Appeals in Edwards v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:44 am
Hull & Chandler, P.A. et al – United States District Court – Western District of North Carolina – January 4, 2023) involves a claim of a stolen deposit placed in a bank. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 8:55 am
Frighteningly, at the end of its last Term, the Supreme Court accepted review of a North Carolina case (Moore v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:30 am
United States and Fong Yue Ting v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:20 am
No North Carolina case, statute, or rule. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:01 pm
United States, 328 F.2d 739, 743 (10th Cir. 1964) (so holding); State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 4:48 am
Holding: Rationale: Defendant contended that his due process rights, afforded to him under the United States Constitution as well as the North Carolina Constitution, were violated due to the 19-month delay in entry of the ED Order from the hearing date. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:08 pm
West face of the United States Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:27 am
Though the result was preordained, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its decision in FTC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
Batson challenges to strikes related to Black Lives Matter support Decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1986, Batson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:37 am
On the passport application, Respondent stated she would be using the passport to travel to the United States for six weeks. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am
Earlier this week the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:09 am
J.A. 129–31.In support of its motion, SKI provided a sworn declarationfrom a senior managerof SKI, stating that all of SKI’s salesare to customers outside of the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:24 pm
Molinet v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:24 am
State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
That’s the question arising out of North Carolina’s recent passage of House Bill 2 (HB 2), a law that takes away existing anti-discrimination rights from LGBT people and makes it impossible for them to seek protection through normal legislative or judicial processes.The Text of HB 2In a single day, during a specially convened legislative session (which apparently cost the North Carolina taxpayers more than $40,000), the North Carolina… [read post]
