Search for: "United States v. Frank"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,016
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2011, 12:27 pm
United States, 440 U. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 10:25 am
For the Symposium on Mary Anne Franks, The Cult of the Constitution (Stanford University Press, 2019).Mary Anne FranksOn July 25, 1974, Representative Barbara Jordan of Texas opened her argument for impeaching the President the of the United States by reflecting on the preamble to the Constitution. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:23 am
United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989).United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:45 am
Williams v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm
CPL 240.20(1)(h) requires the prosecutor disclose "Anything required to be disclosed, prior to trial, to the defendant by the prosecutor, pursuant to the constitution of this state or of the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:01 am
United States, 584 F. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
Anyone interested in seeing how a very smart judge can write the equivalent of a treatise in nine pages should read Frank Easterbrook's opinion in National Rifle Association of America v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:56 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 1:49 pm
Hawkins v. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 2:41 pm
") The other group learned the invention's history first, and was less likely to see the invention as obvious.(...)KSR's lawyer James Dabney, a partner at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, says that the change doesn't weaken his client's position at all: "The solicitor general of the United States and the Patent and Trademark Office have filed a brief that strongly disagrees with Mr. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
One must not forget that tribal immunity is a creature of the federal courts, and is not expressly recognized by Congress, the United States Constitution, or Indian treaties. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
One must not forget that tribal immunity is a creature of the federal courts, and is not expressly recognized by Congress, the United States Constitution, or Indian treaties. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:45 pm
Power Ventures, set for 9:30 am on Dec. 9 before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, California. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, “as the arbitrator grounded his reasoning in the evidence, including an assessment of the employee as frank and apologetic,” the Department’s contention that termination is the only appropriate penalty “is without merit,” citing United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 v Board of Education, 1 NY3d 72. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit agreed. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit agreed. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:24 am
In August 2016, the case was transferred from Connecticut to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, case no. 1:16-cv-06378. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:04 am
On December 22, 2011, the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) issued a 3-2 en banc decision that limits the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) outside of the United States. [read post]
